Examination of Evidence in Civil Cases by Advocates from the Perspective of Professional Ethics

Authors

  • Wilhelmina Setia Atmadja Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia
  • Elizabeth Prima Ratrisasi Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia
  • Jason Marvin Wijaya Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia
  • Maheswari Queena Dewani Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia
  • Shintia Januarita Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia
  • Abu Thalhah Al Anshari Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia
  • Yuni Prisilla Ginting Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia
  • Pietro Grassio Eko Yulio Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tanggerang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Proof of Civil Cases, Advocates, Code of Ethics, Professional Ethics

Abstract

The advocate profession plays a very important role in the justice system, especially in ensuring the implementation of the principles of justice and the supremacy of law. As part of law enforcement, advocates have a moral and professional responsibility to defend the rights of clients without ignoring the established professional ethics. However, in practice, violations of the code of ethics are still often found by advocates, especially in the examination and proof stages of civil cases, which can damage public trust in the judicial institution. This study aims to analyze the importance of implementing the advocate code of ethics in the process of proving civil cases and its impact on the integrity of the profession and legal justice. This study uses a normative legal approach with a literature study method., which analyzes various laws and regulations, legal documents, court decisions, and relevant literature on the ethics of the legal profession. In addition, a conceptual approach is also used to explore a deep understanding of the moral values ​​and integrity of the legal profession. The results of the study indicate that the enforcement of the advocate code of ethics through the internal supervision mechanism of professional organizations and the improvement of legal ethics education is very important in shaping the behavior of professional and responsible advocates. Commitment to the code of ethics not only maintains the dignity of the profession, but also strengthens public trust in a fair, transparent, and dignified judicial process. Therefore, the development and enforcement of ethics must be the main agenda in the reform of the advocate profession in Indonesia.

References

Adillah, R., & Ramadhan, K. (2024). Standar Etika Dan Tantangan Profesi Hukum Advokat Di Era Digital. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(6), 7654–7666.

Ardiansyah, N., Oktaviani, Z., & Adiningsih, Y. (2023). Sanksi Kode Etik Advokat Sebagai Sarana Penegakan Integritas. Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 1(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx

As’ad, A. R. (2013). Akta Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata, http://fakultashukumdarussalam.blogspot.com/2012/11/akta-elektronik-sebagai-alat- bukti.html,. Blogspot.Com.

Bakhri, S. (2009). Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana. Pusat Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum (P3IH).

Effendie, B., Tasmin, M., & Chodari, A. (2001). Surat Gugat Dan Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, M. Y. (2003). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Edisi kedua. Sinar Grafika.

Indroharto. (1993). Usaha memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Buku II,. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Jurdi, F. (2022). Etika Profesi Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana.

Lasdin Wlas. (1989). Cakrawala Advokat Indonesia. Jakarta: Liberty.

Lubis, F., Nabilla, T. P., Lubis, A., Mutia, N., Khoirunnisa, & Ihsandi, A. (2025). Hak dan Kewajiban Advokat dalam Menjaga Keseimbangan antara Kepentingan Klien dan Integritas Hukum. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(1), 1078–1082.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1991). Etika Dasar: Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral. Kanisius.

Pangaribuan, L. M. . (2021). Advokat Organisasi dan Kedudukannya dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman,. Papas Sinar Sinanti.

Prasasti, N. D., Abella, P., & Marzadi, H. (2025). Analisis pelanggaran kode etik advokat dan perannya dalam meningkatkan profesionalisme profesi advokat. Journal of Development Economics and Digitalization, Tourism Economics (JDEDTE), 2(1), 81–93.

Rosyadi, R., & Hartini, S. (2003). Advokat Dalam Perspektif Islam Dan Hukum Positif. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sinaga, N. A. (2020). Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460

Sinaga, V. H. (2011). Dasar-dasar Profesi Advokat. Erlangga.

Sumaryono, E. (1995). Etika Profesi Hukum, Norma Bagi Penegak Hukum. Kanisius.

Supriyadi. (2006). Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia, Jakara: Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Atmadja, W. S., Ratrisasi, E. P., Wijaya, J. M., Dewani, M. Q., Januarita, S., Anshari, A. T. A., Ginting, Y. P., & Yulio, P. G. E. (2025). Examination of Evidence in Civil Cases by Advocates from the Perspective of Professional Ethics. Indonesia Law College Association Law Journal, 4(1), 1–11. Retrieved from https://ejournal.psthi.or.id/index.php/ILCALaw/article/view/27